East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump(en inglés)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 18-cv-06810-JST (N.D. Cal.)
In long-running litigation over the Circumvention of Lawful Pathways asylum rule, the district court (Judge Tigar) first vacated the rule on July 25, 2023.
Decidido
2026-05-07
Resumen
In long-running litigation over the Circumvention of Lawful Pathways asylum rule, the district court (Judge Tigar) first vacated the rule on July 25, 2023. The Ninth Circuit vacated that ruling and remanded in April 2025 to address intervening law and policy changes. On May 7, 2026, the district court reaffirmed its original conclusion and again vacated the rule nationwide as inconsistent with the asylum statute.
Estado actual
As of this writing, the rule stands vacated nationwide unless a higher court issues a stay — agencies and immigration judges should not hold a border crossing during the rule's active window (May 2023–May 2025) against an asylum applicant's eligibility under it. Whether a specific pending case is actually being handled consistently with this ruling isn't something this app can confirm.
Relacionado: The Circumvention of Lawful Pathways Asylum Rule — In Effect, Then Expired, Then Vacated
Leer la fuente primaria ↗Fuente: CourtListener: East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump
CaseWhy Plus
Si estás rastreando un caso, obtén una respuesta fundamentada en este fallo específico y en los hechos de tu caso.
Información general sobre un fallo judicial público, no asesoría legal ni un diagnóstico de ningún caso específico. Para orientación específica sobre su caso, consulte a un abogado de inmigración con licencia.