CaseWhy
All policy memos

When USCIS Issues a Request for Evidence vs. Denies Outright

A 2018 policy (PM-602-0050.1) gave officers discretion to deny an application outright, without first issuing a Request for Evidence (RFE) or Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID), whenever required initial evidence was missing — a real, if temporary, tightening of when applicants got a chance to respond before a denial.

Published

2021-06-09

Summary

A 2018 policy (PM-602-0050.1) gave officers discretion to deny an application outright, without first issuing a Request for Evidence (RFE) or Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID), whenever required initial evidence was missing — a real, if temporary, tightening of when applicants got a chance to respond before a denial. That policy was rescinded January 20, 2021, and on June 9, 2021 USCIS reverted to the longer-standing adjudicative principle (dating to June 2013): officers should issue an RFE or NOID, giving the applicant a chance to submit more evidence, whenever additional evidence could plausibly establish eligibility, rather than denying outright.

Current status

This is the current operative standard — USCIS issuing an RFE or NOID generally means the officer believes the case could still be approved with more evidence, not that the case is in jeopardy.

Read the primary source ↗

Source: USCIS Notice to Appear Policy Memorandum history (archived)

General policy background, not a diagnosis of any specific case — CaseWhy's own case status API never confirms why a case is delayed. For guidance specific to your case, talk to a licensed immigration attorney.

When USCIS Issues a Request for Evidence vs. Denies Outright, Explained | CaseWhy